The Put Up Or Shut Up Argument In Gun Control
What is not being mentioned in the Main Stream Media is that
hunters, many of who use semi automatic rifles with high capacity magazines
provide more food for the homeless than any other group of people.
Front page of the Houston Chronicle dated February 6, 2013 ran a
headline, “Harris County has plan to bring home the bacon”
The feral hog population in Texas is out of control and in an effort to
reduce the population they plan to capture and process hogs to feed the
Texas tons of pork is donated to homeless
shelters and organizations that feed the hungry.
Hunters have been quietly donating tons of meat to organizations that
feed the hungry for an unspoken number of years.
Groups like Hunters Harvest and Hunters for Hungry have been gathering
meat donations from hunters via local processing plants.
Groups like these are supplied large volumes of game meat from hunting
members of organizations like the Safari Club International.
A member of the Houston Safari Club reported that hunters in an effort to
manage game populations need to cull the herds to insure the health of the
animals. This creates harvesting in
excess of what the hunters can eat.
This led to the donating of meat by the tons to the hungry as in homeless
shelters for example.
Many are calling for gun control base on their emotions but the facts
weigh in on the side of gun owners.
All the anti gun arguers combined don’t have a leg to stand on when it comes to
what they do to help the less fortunate in comparison to gun owning hunters in
this country. Gun owning hunters
clearly let their actions and deeds speak for themselves instead of knee jerk
emotions sparked by a tragedy that happen to involve a gun.
When the anti gun whiners do for the less fortunate as much as the gun
owning hunters do then they may earn the right to be vocal and be seen as having
a bit of validity in their arguments.
The righteous point always prevails in the end.
© 2013 anobody.com